This I petition was approved. Please read our compiled reviews from the internet, from Google to AVVO, on what our clients have said about our firm. Family and Relative Immigration. As some of you know, priority dates for Philippine nationals under the family-based immigration category F4 are more retrogressed than other countries. Our client is from India who came to the U. Currently, she resides in Illinois with her husband and daughter. Originally Posted by Venus.
They have to prove physical presence in December Prior to retaining our firm, her U. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices and fingerprint appointment all came on time. Furthermore, our client was placed in removal proceeding in December Those who were beneficiaries of petitions filed prior to January 14, could still adjust despite an EWI record, and those people do not have to meet the December physical presence requirement. On December 20, , our office filed his I adjustment of status application and I Supplement A under the i category for our client.
In Februaryher priority date became current.
His wife filed her adjustment of status application by virtue of an approved and current I petition filed for her and invoked Ketter i in the process as the principal beneficiary. Prior to retaining our firm, her U. However, this left thousands of otherwise qualified persons who had not begun the process unable to covdr status in the United States.
Yes you can include such a letter. Hmmmm what kinda documention should I include? Furthermore, our client was placed in removal proceeding in December Our Filipino client came to the U. Accordingly, she could be a beneficiary under the INA Section i.
The spouse or child also are legter even after losing the status of spouse or childsuch as by divorce or by becoming 21 years of age …. Our client is from Mexico who came to the U. For an alien to independently qualify for adjustment of status under section i of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.
245(I) question “grandfathered derivate beneficiary alien”
Later, his legter status expired and he overstayed his status. Virginia Our Filipina client came to the U. Anchorage, Alaska Our Filipina client came to the U. On November 10,our office filed their I adjustment of status applications under the i category for our client and her son.
From immigration of children, parents, siblings, to cases involving iCSPA, and the death of a petitioner, we are here to help. Yet she remained in the United States. Washington Our Filipino client came to the U.
Those who were beneficiaries of petitions filed prior to January 14, could still adjust despite an EWI record, and those people do not have to meet the December physical presence requirement. Attorney JP Sarmiento from our office accompanied our client.
(I) question “grandfathered derivate beneficiary alien” – DREAM Act Portal Forum
After a long wait, our client is finally a green card holder. Our Korean client came to the U. Resources Do I qualify? There was no RFEs even. Me and my husband are super excited! Family and Relative Immigration. Prior to retaining our firm, our client was a derivative beneficiary of an I petition for her mother. Everything went smoothly and the receipt notices, fingerprint appointment, and work permits all came on time.
Therefore, she had to wait for more than 20 years in order to even apply for her green card. Find all posts by Venus. There was another precedent before this, however this ruling just affirmed it. In our brief in support, our office argued that our client is the beneficiary of an approved I petition filed before January 14,by virtue of the I filed for her mother in including her as a derivative when she was only 13 years old.
Four years later, on January 14,Congress phased Section i out and made amendments. Our client came to the U.